As reported, during a percutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl), the user injected saline into a ultraxx nephrostomy balloon and set and found the balloon was leaking.The issue with this device was discovered prior to making contact with the patient, and the device was not used.An image of the device was provided which appears to show that the balloon was ruptured.A new device was used to complete the procedure.There was no impact to the patient.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary: as reported, during a percutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl), the user injected saline into a ultraxx nephrostomy balloon and set and found the balloon was leaking.The issue with this device was discovered prior to making contact with the patient, and the device was not used.An image of the device was provided which appears to show that the balloon was ruptured.A new device was used to complete the procedure.There was no impact to the patient.Investigation - evaluation.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.One package containing an ultraxx nephrostomy balloon and set was returned for investigation.Visual examination confirmed that the balloon was ruptured 14.5cm from the distal tip.The balloon material was completely torn all the way around the circumference.The balloon material had biological matter present at the distal tip.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.There were no identified gaps in the manufacturing instructions or quality control procedures.Current controls for manufacturing are in place to assure functionality and device integrity prior to shipping.Based on available evidence, cook has concluded that the most probable cause of the reported event could not be determined from the available information.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|