The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.A review of lot-specific similar complaints revealed no indication of a lot-specific product quality issue.Based on available information, the reported positioning failure (leaflet grasping and leaflet capture) and poor image resolution appear to be due to challenging patient anatomy.The reported tissue damage appears to be a cascading effect of the reported positioning failure.Additionally, tissue damage is listed in the ifu as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.There is no indication of product issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
This is filed to report tissue damage.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.The clip delivery system (cds) was advanced to the mitral valve and noted thin leaflets and a heavily calcified shelf under the posterior leaflet, causing difficulty to visualize the clip.Several grasping attempts were made but adequate reduction of mr could not be achieved.There was loss of leaflet capture after the grippers had been lowered about 5-10 times.An additional posterior leaflet flail was noted after several attempts.The physician believed this to be due to the repeated grasping attempts.Ultimately, the clip was removed still attached to the delivery system.The procedure took extra time, but the length of time did not change the outcome.The patient is stable and recovering.No additional information was provided.
|