• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THE SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE; STYLET, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THE SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE; STYLET, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 518-062
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Atrial Fibrillation (1729); Iatrogenic Source (2498); Atrial Perforation (2511)
Event Date 01/22/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device lot number, expiration date unavailable.Device manufacture date unavailable because lot number unavailable.
 
Event Description
A lead extraction procedure commenced to remove a right atrial (ra) lead due to malfunction and occlusion.The attempted lead removal was performed on the right side of the patient.A spectranetics lead locking device (lld) was inserted into the ra lead to provide traction to aid in extraction.The physician began by using a spectranetics 14f glidelight laser sheath to attempt removal of the lead.The decision was made not to retract the helix of the ra lead to prevent it from pulling free before the glidelight device could get through the occlusion.The 14f glidelight device was used through the occlusion, in the top part of the superior vena cava (svc) because of lead on lead binding, and as the curve of the ra lead was straightening out towards the distal end of the lead.The ra lead popped free into the sheath and it was felt at the time that all was successful.However, the patient's blood pressure began to drift down and anesthesia noticed an effusion that was growing.After discussion within the team as to whether to attempt a pericardiocentesis vs.A sub-xiphoid window, ultimately the sub-xiphoid window was created.Blood was drained and the patient stabilized within five minutes of draining the blood; however, the cardiothoracic surgeon did not find a source of the bleeding.The physician then continued with the re-implantation of a new ra lead.The procedure was successful and the patient survived.In discussion after the case, the team believed the tear was probably caused by pulling the lead free of the ra and that it clotted to seal the area.No suturing was needed, as the surgical team could not find any tear.There was no alleged malfunction of any spectranetics device in use during the procedure.On (b)(6) 2021, the philips representative communicated to the manufacturer that the physician said "they are pulling the drain today.She is feeling fine.She went into atrial fibrillation, not surprising".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE
Type of Device
STYLET, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
THE SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION
9965 federal drive
colorado springs CO 80921
Manufacturer Contact
barbara creel
9965 federal drive
colorado springs, CO 80921
719447-246
MDR Report Key11345622
MDR Text Key241431054
Report Number1721279-2021-00023
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRB
UDI-Device Identifier00813132023072
UDI-Public00813132023072
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K142116
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number518-062
Device Catalogue Number518-062
Device Lot NumberUNAVAILABLE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/18/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
Patient Weight54
-
-