Original implant date unknown.Dr.Said the patient came in with a dislocated hip.He wanted to perform a head and liner exchange while doing an open reduction.Dr believed a pinnacle dual mobility liner would be the best option for this patient with their dislocation history.When i asked dr about this patient's history of revisions, he wasn't sure of when they took place, and who performed the procedures.When shown the x-rays, it appeared to be our acetabular component, but not our femoral stem.Upon opening the hip, it was confirmed the liner did belong to depuy, but the femoral head was competitor.Once the dm liner was implanted, a trial reduction was performed with zb's 28mm head and our dm liner trial.Once the desired head was found, the parts were opened, assembled, and implanted.The hip was found to be stable, so the closing process began.Doi: unknown, dor: (b)(6) 2021, affected side: left hip.
|
Product complaint (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.It has been reported the depuy acetabular device had been implanted in conjunction with a competitor manufactured femoral device.This is considered off label use.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: a device history record (mre) review, was not possible because the required lot code was not provided.
|