• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: V60 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

V60 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number V60
Device Problems Contamination (1120); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: (b)(6) 2021.Date of report: 11mar2021.
 
Event Description
The customer called into technical support (ts) reporting that the device is displaying (blower over temp alarm) error code.The device was in clinical use at the time the reported issue was discovered; however, there was no harm to the patient or user.The customer evaluated the device with the assistance of the remote service engineer (rse) and confirmed the reported problem.The customer reports that the air inlet filter was clean and that the circulation fan operates however the filter was very dirty to the point it could have lead to heat build up.The rse advised the customer to replace the filters and clear any dust from the unit.The rse also advised to perform pvt to see if the issue can be duplicated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
G4:29mar2021.B4:06apr2021.The device was in clinical use at the time the reported issue was discovered; however, there was no harm to the patient or user.Since this was an alarm the staff was unfamiliar with, the v60 ventilator was promptly changed out to another v60 ventilator.The patient did not experience any adverse effects or additional interventions due to the alarm on the v60 as therapy was not interrupted.It was also noted that after the blower's initial alarm over-temp, the v60 continued to ventilate the patient without further alarms.Another respiratory therapist staff member brought the second v60 unit to the patient's room, entered the appropriate settings and alarms on the second v60 (while the patient remained on the first v60).The mask, circuit, and filters were changed from the first v60 over to the second v60, without interrupting the niv therapy the patient was receiving.According to the diagnostic report, the timeframe between the initial alarm for "blower over temp" to "system shutdown" was only 18 minutes.It was reported that there was no troubleshooting needed to be performed, as this was an alarm not common to the end-user, traced to user error.The customer evaluated the device with the assistance of the remote service engineer (rse) and confirmed that the air inlet filter was clean and that the circulation fan operates; however, the filter was very dirty to the point it could have lead to heat build-up.The customer was advised to replace the filters and clear any dust from the unit.Submission of a report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, distributor, manufacturer, or product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
G4:29mar2021 and b4:19apr2021.In the initial call, the hospital's biomed indicated that the air inlet filter was clean; however, the cooling fan filter was very dirty to the point that it could have lead to heat build-up.The biomed reported that the cooling fan filter was cleaned during performance verification testing (pvt).The v60 user and service manuals indicate that the cooling fan filter can collect lint and dust and, therefore, be inspected and cleaned/replaced at regular intervals to ensure proper system performance.The service guide specifies a monthly frequency for cooling fan filter inspection.Based on this information, it has been concluded that the reported failure occurred due to user error.There was no device malfunction.Submission of a report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, distributor, manufacturer, or product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
V60 VENTILATOR
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE
MDR Report Key11468022
MDR Text Key242581300
Report Number2031642-2021-00939
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MNT
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K082660
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type user facility
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/11/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberV60
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/11/2021
Initial Date FDA Received03/11/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/11/2021
02/11/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/06/2021
04/19/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/26/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNKNOWN PATIENT CIRCUIT, MASK, AND HUMIDIFIER
-
-