Visual, and dimensional analysis was performed on the returned omnilink elite.The reported deformation was confirmed.The failure to advance and device marking problem were not confirmed due to the condition of the device.Additionally, it was noted that the stent implant was stationary on the balloon but dislocated distally and dimensional analysis revealed the crimped stent profiles measured above the maximum crimped stent specification a review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other complaints reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine conclusive cause for the reported difficulties.The introducer sheath used in this case was not returned; therefore, the exact inner diameter was unable to be determined.However, it may be possible that the inner diameter of the non-abbott introducer sheath was smaller than the recommended sheath diameter of 0.085 inches (2.15mm) indicated on the omnilink elite product label.It should be noted that there is no specific industry definition of 6f sheath dimensions or what it means to have a product that is 6f compatible.Several of the manufacturers label their product with a "generic" 2.0mm labeled specification based on the fact that the definition of 6f is 2mm.However, this does not reflect the actual inner diameter of the sheath.The only guidance the sheath producers have is to make the inner diameter larger than 2.00mm and smaller than 2.33mm.This contrasts with the convention for guiding catheters that have a clear definition of a maximum outer diameter of 2.0mm.The lack of clear industry guidance may be a contributing factor to why there is a broad range of inner diameters found in commercial introducer sheaths.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion located in an unspecified vessel.The stent packaging stated that the stent delivery system is compatible with a 6f introducer; however, when advancing the stent delivery system (sds) in a 6f introducer, the sds could not advance.When applying force to attempt to push the stent system, a kink occurred in the shaft and the stent system became unusable.The device was removed without issue.There was no adverse patient effect or a clinically significant delay in procedure.A non-abbott stent was implanted to complete the procedure.Device analysis on (b)(6) 2021 revealed the measured crimped stent profile was higher than the maximum crimped stent profile.Also, the stent implant was stationary on the balloon but dislocated distally to the balloon proximal marker band.No additional information was provided.
|