(b)(4).Publication year of 2020.(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the manufacturing records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.What are the specific intraoperative complications (n=3) reported for the non-iem group? if information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported via journal article: title: patients with ineffective esophageal motility benefit from laparoscopic antireflux surgery.Author: alex addo, philip george, h.Reza zahiri, adrian park.Citation: not reported.Doi: https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00464-020-07951-4.This single-institution, retrospective review aims to analyze and compare qol outcomes following lars among patients with and without ineffective esophageal motility (iem).From january 2012 to july 2019, 203 patients (75.4% female) underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery (lars) and were divided into two groups based on patients peristalsis: ineffective esophageal motility (iem) (n=44, male n=8, female n=36, age 58.1 ¿ 15.3, bm 27.4 ¿ 4.1) and non-iem (n=159, male n=42, female n=117, age 62.2 ¿ 12, bmi 28.2 ¿ 4.9).Patients in non-iem group who did not receive either partial or completer fundoplication, received either linx (ethicon) or gatstropexy alone.In the non-iem group, unspecified intraoperative complications (n=3) was reported.Arrhythmia (n=1), urinary retention (n=1), prolonged ileus (n=1), urinary tract infection (n=2), myocardial infarction (n=1), reoperation (n=4) and recurrence (n=1) were reported as post-operative complications.Patients with ineffective esophageal motility derive significant benefits in perioperative and qol outcomes after lars.Nevertheless, as anticipated, their baseline dysmotility may reduce the degree of improvement in dysphagia rates post-surgery compared to patients with normal motility.Furthermore, the presence of preoperative iem should not be a contraindication for complete fundoplication.Key to optimal outcomes after lars is careful patient selection based on objective perioperative data, including manometry evaluation, with the purpose of tailoring surgery to provide effective reflux control and improved esophageal clearance.
|