Qn# (b)(4).Device history record was reviewed for notifications pertaining to incoming inspection, stock checks, and product returns.No concerns were noted with reference to 500412.(1) sample of 500412 was received for evaluation.The lot # is not consistent with pilling manufacturing and lacks the lifelok logo.This device is either >20 years old and beyond expected life or is fraudulently marked with the pilling trademark.This device should also bear the weck brand after the pilling brand regardless of age , but it does not appear on any surface of the device.The device part number is laser etched on the back side of the boxlock inconsistent with traditional pilling layout.The fracture plane was observed under magnification to determine that the break originated on the inside face of the jaw near the boxlock.The fracture progressed over time which is evident from the rust development within the fracture.1) sample of 500412 was received for evaluation.The lot # is not consistent with pilling manufacturing and lacks the lifelok logo.This device is either >20 years old and beyond expected life or is fraudulently marked with the pilling trademark.This device should also bear the weck brand after the pilling brand regardless of age , but it does not appear on any surface of the device.The device part number is laser etched on the back side of the boxlock inconsistent with traditional pilling layout and etching methods.The fracture plane was observed under magnification to determine that the break originated on the inside face of the jaw near the boxlock.The fracture progressed over time which is evident from the rust development within the fracture.A dimensional inspection was not required as part of this investigation.A functional inspection was not required as part of this investigation.No confirmed complaints were received in this range with the same issue.Isolated incident and beyond useful life.
|