• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR; CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR; CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 256089
Device Problem Device Ingredient or Reagent Problem (2910)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/12/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device expiration date: unknown.Device manufacture date: unknown.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated, but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported while testing for sars cov-2 an alleged false negative result was obtained.The customer stated they are testing asymptomatic patients.This test is not intended for use on asymptomatic patients and was therefore used off label.A repeat test was performed using pcr and the result was negative.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.Eua#: (b)(4).The following information was provided by the initial reporter: " up on directly talking to the customer informed that it is actually a false negative that they obtained through bd veritor plus analyzer.The customer tested eight family members and all came negative with the bd veritor sars cov 2 assay.But with the pcr one person who is asymptomatic tested positive, they did rapid test again with the veritor which came came out negative.The customer is now suspecting the pcr to be false positive, but in order to confirm it they may have to spent more for additional testings and itherefore is hesitant to do so.Customer had to perform pcr as well as rapid test to others due to this incident.Wanted to have an explanation for if false negative.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Eua#: (b)(4).Investigation summary: bd has received several customer complaints for false positive results, when using bd sars-cov-2 reagents for bd veritor¿ system.The current investigation concerns multiple lots of bd sars-cov-2 reagents for bd veritor¿ system.Bd takes a systematic approach to investigating false positive complaints that are received.This approach involves review of manufacturing batch history records, testing of retention samples, and testing of customer returned samples if applicable.Due to unknown lot# a dhr could not be performed.The investigation did not find a root cause for the false positive results that were observed.It is recommended that each customer review their workflow carefully to ensure that the package insert is being followed as written.The root cause is under investigation and will be documented in our quality system.Bd cannot confirm the complaint based on the investigation that was performed.A corrective and preventive action (capa#(b)(4)) is already initiated to investigate the root cause and some mitigation actions are already being addressed.
 
Event Description
It was reported while testing for sars cov-2 an alleged false negative result was obtained.The customer stated they are testing asymptomatic patients.This test is not intended for use on asymptomatic patients and was therefore used off label.A repeat test was performed using pcr and the result was negative.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.Eua#: (b)(4).The following information was provided by the initial reporter: " up on directly talking to the customer informed that it is actually a false negative that they obtained through bd veritor plus analyzer.The customer tested eight family members and all came negative with the bd veritor sars cov 2 assay.But with the pcr one person who is asymptomatic tested positive, they did rapid test again with the veritor which came out negative.The customer is now suspecting the pcr to be false positive, but in order to confirm it they may have to spent more for additional testings and therefore is hesitant to do so.Customer had to perform pcr as well as rapid test to others due to this incident.Wanted to have an explanation for if false negative.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: this investigation is to summarize the complaints that alleges false negative or discrepant results when using kit bd veritor for rapid detection of sars-cov-2 ce (mn# 256089), batch number unknown.Bd quality performs a systematic approach to investigate false negative complaints.This approach involves review of manufacturing batch history records, testing of retention samples, and testing of customer returned samples if applicable.The investigation could not be performed as no batch number was provided.The complaint was unable to be confirmed.Bd quality will continue to monitor for trends.There were no corrective actions taken at this time.
 
Event Description
It was reported while testing for sars cov-2 an alleged false negative result was obtained.The customer stated they are testing asymptomatic patients.This test is not intended for use on asymptomatic patients and was therefore used off label.A repeat test was performed using pcr and the result was negative.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.Eua#: (b)(4).The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "up on directly talking to the customer informed that it is actually a false negative that they obtained through bd veritor plus analyzer.The customer tested eight family members and all came negative with the bd veritor sars cov 2 assay.But with the pcr one person who is asymptomatic tested positive, they did rapid test again with the veritor which came out negative.The customer is now suspecting the pcr to be false positive, but in order to confirm it they may have to spent more for additional testings and therefore is hesitant to do so.Customer had to perform pcr as well as rapid test to others due to this incident.Wanted to have an explanation for if false negative.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR
Type of Device
CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
brett wilko
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key11634511
MDR Text Key274347406
Report Number1119779-2021-00623
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QKP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,other,user facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/10/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number256089
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/15/2021
Initial Date FDA Received04/08/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/02/2021
09/10/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/12/2021
09/22/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-