• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES GMBH UNK - REDUCTION/RETRACTION/DISTRACTION INSTRUMENTS: SPINE; EXTRACTOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES GMBH UNK - REDUCTION/RETRACTION/DISTRACTION INSTRUMENTS: SPINE; EXTRACTOR Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).The event date is unknown.This report is for an unk - reduction/retraction/distraction instruments: spine/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number, the device history records review could not be completed as no product was received.The investigation could not be completed, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: this report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: byvaltsev v.A., kalinin a.A., minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilization surgery in patients with overweight and obesity, voprosy neurochirurgii [neurosurgery topics] volume 82 (5), pages 1-13 (russia) https://doi.Org/10.17116/neiro20188205169.This prospective non-randomized single center study aims to investigate the effectiveness of new, minimally invasive rigid fixation technology and the traditional open method of fusion in the surgical treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar segments in overweight and obese patients.From 2010 to 2015 , a total of 73 patients (49 men and 24 women) with a median age of 53 (42¿65) who underwent spinal canal reconstruction, single-level interbody transforaminal fusion with a cage, and transpedicular stabilization for single-level lumbar spine degeneration were included in the study.In group 1 (mis-tlif, n=32) with 21 males and 11 females age, years (me 52 (43; 64) decompression was carried using a minimally invasive quadrant retraction system (medtronic, usa), insight (synthes, switzerland), or aras (zimmer, germany).Transforaminal fusion was then performed with a t-pal (synthes, switzerland) or capstone (medtronic, usa) cage.Next, viper ii (synthes, switzerland) or u-centum (ulrich, germany) transpedicular screws were simultaneously installed ipsilaterally openly or contralaterally percutaneously.In group 2,with 28 males and 17 females age, years (me (25%; 75%) 49.5 (41; 62) discectomy, preparation of the interbody space and transforaminal fusion with a pezo-t (ulrich, germany) or capstone (medtronic, usa) cage were carried out similarly to group 1.Four-screw open transpedicular stabilization with a konmet system (russia) was then performed.Follow-up lasted an average of 34 months in group 1 and 40 months in group 2.The following complications were reported: post-operative complications occurred in 9% in group 1: infections in the surgical intervention region (n=1), adjacent segment disease (n=1), pseudoarthrosis (n=1), muscle atrophy.Group 1 had significantly less severe pain in both the lumbar spine (p<0.05) and the lower limbs (p<0.05) due to less soft tissue injury during the approach.A case of (b)(6) patient from group 1 had muscle atrophy 11%, left 7.14 cm2, atrophy 19.Soft tissue injury during the approach.(intraoperative).This report is for an unknown synthes t-pal cage and unknown synthes insight.This report is for (1) unk - reduction/retraction/distraction instruments: spine this report is 2 of 2 (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - REDUCTION/RETRACTION/DISTRACTION INSTRUMENTS: SPINE
Type of Device
EXTRACTOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6103142063
MDR Report Key11653510
MDR Text Key261748690
Report Number8030965-2021-02803
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeRS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/15/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/15/2021
Initial Date FDA Received04/12/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-