It was reported that the procedure was to treat a mildly calcified de novo popliteal artery.Via ante-grade access, a command 18 guide wire was advanced to the lesion.Then a 4.5x150mm supera stent was advanced and confirmed deployed under fluoroscopy.The thumb slide was retracted back to the starting position and both system lock and deployment lock were rotated into locked position.While removing the delivery system, resistance was met and it was noted that the catheter tip was caught onto the proximal section of the implanted stent.The system and deployment lock were unlocked and the thumbslide moved forward and again retracted back to the starting position and re-locked the system and deployment lock.However, the section of the catheter tip was again caught onto the proximal section of the implanted stent.The physician proceeded with a contra-lateral femoral access approach, advanced another guide wire past the stent, inflated a 4x100mm armada 18 balloon at the mid section of the stent and eventually managed to remove the delivery system.The stent remained in position with a final angiogram run showing good results.There was no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported entrapment of the device could not be confirmed/ tested as the stent was not returned.There was noted stretching of the inner member with biological materials noted inside and outside the sheath.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.The investigation determined that operational context is the likely cause for the reported difficulties.It is likely that the supera device encountered significant anatomical challenges during the procedure that while attempting to remove the delivery system from the mildly calcified de novo popliteal artery became entrapped.Antegrade access is a different approach used and as noted there were biological materials noted inside and outside the distal portion of the sheath which means that this likely caused difficulties with the catheter tip and stent.The inner member stretching is likely caused by attempting to reset and remove the system a second time.The unexpected action to insert another guidewire and dilate a balloon to remove the delivery system is based on these case circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.Na.
|