Block h6: medical device problem code a0501 captures the reportable event of brush detached.Block h10: investigation results: an rx cytology brush was received for analysis.Visual inspection of the returned device revealed that the working length (extrusion and pull wire) was kinked in several locations, approximately at 70cm, 23cm, 110cm and 17cm from the black heat shrink.Additionally, device was disassembled and it was observed that the pull wire was broken adjacent to the handle cannula joint.Due to the device condition the functional assessment could not be performed.Through the microscope, it was observed that the brush was broken and was not returned.No other issues were noted.Therefore, the reported event of brush detached was confirmed.In summary, based on the provided and collected information, this device met all manufacturing requirements and no abnormalities were reported during the manufacturing process; during the product analysis the working length was found kinked/bent and the brush was broken.It is possible that the way in which the device was handled and manipulated, it may have contributed to the encountered failure (brush detachment of device or device component and handle detachment/separate), as per complaint information the issue occurred during the preparation, it is most likely that handling and manipulation of the device during its use could have contributed to the encountered issues.An excessive force applied to the device when they tried to the actuate can lead to the brush was broken.In addition the handle cannula was found kinked/bent, this could be due to the amount of force applied and manipulation during the procedure, this condition could result in the pull wire being broken from the handle cannula.Based on the information available and the analysis performed, the investigation conclusion code for the complaint event will be documented as "adverse event related to procedure" since the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications at the time of release for distribution.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
|