• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT DUO M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX DUAL-LUMEN, 9.5F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT DUO M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX DUAL-LUMEN, 9.5F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 1829500
Device Problems Partial Blockage (1065); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/01/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date:12/2021).
 
Event Description
It was reported that some time post port placement, the port septum allegedly dislodged.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a complaint history review was performed.This is the third complaint reported for this lot number and the lot met all release criteria.A device history record review is required.Investigation summary: one powerport mri duo was returned for evaluation.Functional gross visual, microscopic evaluations were performed.The investigation is confirmed for the reported material protrusion and partially blockage issue as right port septa was partially dislodged while infusing and also the right port septum failed the mandrel test as the black mark was not fully inserted into the lumen.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2021), g3, h6 (device, method).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately three months post port placement, the port septum was allegedly dislodged.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately three months post port placement, the port septum was allegedly dislodged.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one powerport mri duo was returned for evaluation.Functional gross visual, microscopic evaluations were performed.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported material protrusion and partially blockage issue as exact circumstance for the time of event was unknown.Further during functional evaluation both right and left port septum passed the mandrel test as the black mark was fully inserted into the lumen.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2021).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT DUO M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX DUAL-LUMEN, 9.5F
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key11736576
MDR Text Key247671086
Report Number3006260740-2021-01571
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741027185
UDI-Public(01)00801741027185
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090512
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/08/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number1829500
Device Catalogue Number1829500
Device Lot NumberREEQ1557
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/01/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/01/2021
Initial Date FDA Received04/28/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/30/2021
03/08/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/03/2021
03/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/15/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-