• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST PAUL BIVONA; TUBE TRACHEOSTOMY AND TUBE CUFF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST PAUL BIVONA; TUBE TRACHEOSTOMY AND TUBE CUFF Back to Search Results
Catalog Number BRCA80
Device Problem Product Quality Problem (1506)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/25/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation in progress.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the bivona inner cannula extended past the end of the tracheostomy tube.The tracheostomy tube had to be removed and replaced as a result.The reporter noted that the product problem could have (a) damaged the trachea upon insertion, and (b) the tracheostomy tube had the potential to collapse and block the end of the tube.The product fault in this incident did not cause or contribute to any patient injury, however.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: event problem and evaluation codes: updated after device evaluation.H10: device evaluation: the device was returned for investigation.A visual inspection and functional test were performed.Sample received by shm: one sample was received for evaluation in used conditions, previously decontaminated and inside a plastic bag without its original packaging.Visual inspection results: it can be seen the brca80 cannula was returned with most probably pn: 670180 bivona tracheostomy tube according its printed dimensions.No damage could be seen on the sample returned.It can be seen the inner cannula is slightly more length than the tracheostomy tube.Functional testing: the sample was tested in process gauge cal.Id 13.1868 p lacing it inside (lg-4-2-001) and using master piece gt20218 in order to detect if dimensional issue is present.Results: the cannula was rejected per calibrated gauge during a test with the process fixture as it can be seen below in picture 4 with the red number which means a reject, only when it is green is acceptable.The most probably root cause is a human error occurred after cutting the brca80 cannula to the required length while dispositioning to scrap since calibrated measuring fixture gauge can detect the returned sample cut dimensional issue.The cause of the reported problem was traced to the manufacturing process.Action taken:1) qalert 21113 "cut of length bivona cannula" was generated on 11-aug-2021 in order to make sure it is used the correct set-up per product code length and reject criteria from manufacture procedure.2) all mitigations on placed were verified and it was confirmed has been executing according, therefore no corrective actions could be implemented at this time.It will be continue monitoring this failure condition in this product for threshold or escalation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIVONA
Type of Device
TUBE TRACHEOSTOMY AND TUBE CUFF
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST PAUL
1265 grey fox rd.
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
NULL
1265 grey fox rd.
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
david halverson
6000 nathan lane north
minneapolis, MN 55442
MDR Report Key11798213
MDR Text Key249727025
Report Number3012307300-2021-04124
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JOH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/28/2023
Device Catalogue NumberBRCA80
Device Lot Number4032512
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/07/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/11/2021
Initial Date FDA Received05/10/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/13/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-