Investigation summary: based on the information available, the cause that contributed to the reported incontinence cannot be established as the product is not available for analysis.Device history record (dhr): a dhr and ship history review cannot be performed as the lot number was not available.Device technical analysis: the device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.Labeling review: the device instructions for use (ifu) was reviewed.The patient symptom urinary incontinence was found to be listed in the ifu.Investigation conclusion: based on the information available, a conclusion code of cause not established was assigned to this investigation.
|