• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 125
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 05/03/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
First investigation: user (surgeon and patient) information analysis: the patient was treated out of the device indications for use as the patient size of the major curve was over 60°.The surgery was performed in a minimal invasive approach (mis), which makes it quite challenging to verify that the surface below the implant is sufficiently clean from any soft or hard tissue before placing the implant.For this reason, the use of mis technique is not recommended by the company and the surgical technique instructs to perform the surgery with an open midline incision.The patient is a competitive swimmer and continued it for two years post-surgery.Material and manufacturing: the production process and material data were reviewed and found acceptance and compliance with the product specification.Conclusion: misuse: insufficient tissue removal below the implant may be the cause of the device breakage - it is challenging to verify that the surface below the implant is sufficiently clear from access tissue when operating in an mis approach.At the location of the fracture pressure from the transverse process or any other hard tissue, below the implant may lead to rod breakage.For this reason, the use of the mis technique is not recommended by the company and the surgical technique instructs to perform the surgery with a vertical midline incision.Although the patient pre-operative kyphosis was below 55, the implant could not accommodate the kyphosis angle developed over time.The patient practice in competitive sports might have also been a contributing cause in the device breakage.Rom early 2019 the company is not recommending the use of 2 extenders, nevertheless, this does not seem to play a part in the subsequent breakage of the device.Corrective action: the company already implemented corrective action with the following: the use of the mis technique is not recommended by the company and the surgical technique instructs to perform the surgery with a vertical midline incision.The company is in the process of implementing an extender bender surgical instrument (eco 8729), which is a tool that will allow the surgeon to bend the extender to better accommodate the patient's kyphosis.Risk assessment: the device breakage current rate is (b)(4) which is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's clinical evaluation report (0.2%-15.5%) (cer dms-(b)(4) rev t).The risk of the broken rod has been assessed and found to be acceptable (dms# (b)(4) rev q1 hazard id 1.8 and id 1.7).
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2021, the surgeon reported by e-mail that follows up x-ray demonstrated the breakage of the implant.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 125
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
adi prager
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key11870728
MDR Text Key252906696
Report Number3013461531-2021-00022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/24/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date11/22/2022
Device Model NumberMID-C 125
Device Catalogue NumberAF125
Device Lot NumberAF 11-05-17
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/03/2021
Initial Date FDA Received05/24/2021
Date Device Manufactured11/22/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-