• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTALINK PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTALINK PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 3241
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 05/14/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that guidewire entrapment occurred and the physician felt pain while holding the sheath.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the proximal circumflex artery.A 1.25mm rotalink plus, a 330cm rotawire and wireclip torquer and a rotablator console were selected for use in a percutaneous coronary intervention.The rotawire was successfully advanced with the non-boston scientific support catheter to the target lesion.The rotalink plus was loaded onto the rotawire up to the homeostatic valve outside the patient.An attempt was made to set the revolutions; however, the number of revolutions could not be read on the rotablator console.The rotalink plus was running for seconds.The physician felt a sharp pain on the thumb that was holding the sheath of the rotalink plus burr.Two small holes were observed on the sheath.Difficulty removing the rotalink plus from the rotawire occurred; therefore both devices were removed together as one.The tip of the rotawire was torn off into two short pieces and remain in the distal circumflex artery.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Event Description
It was reported that guidewire entrapment occurred and the physician felt pain while holding the sheath.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the proximal circumflex artery.A 1.25mm rotalink plus, a 330cm rotawire and wireclip torquer and a rotablator console were selected for use in a percutaneous coronary intervention.The rotawire was successfully advanced with the non-boston scientific support catheter to the target lesion.The rotalink plus was loaded onto the rotawire up to the homeostatic valve outside the patient.An attempt was made to set the revolutions; however, the number of revolutions could not be read on the rotablator console.The rotalink plus was running for seconds.The physician felt a sharp pain on the thumb that was holding the sheath of the rotalink plus burr.Two small holes were observed on the sheath.Difficulty removing the rotalink plus from the rotawire occurred; therefore both devices were removed together as one.The tip of the rotawire was torn off into two short pieces and remain in the distal circumflex artery.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.It was further reported that the target lesion in the proximal circumflex was moderately tortuous and severely calcified.The detached rotawire pieces remained in the patient due to the flow of the vessel was good.The patient is scheduled to return at a later date to treat the lesion.
 
Event Description
It was reported that guidewire entrapment occurred, and the physician felt pain while holding the sheath.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the proximal circumflex artery.A 1.25mm rotalink plus, a 330cm rotawire and wireclip torquer and a rotablator console were selected for use in a percutaneous coronary intervention.The rotawire was successfully advanced with the non-boston scientific support catheter to the target lesion.The rotalink plus was loaded onto the rotawire up to the homeostatic valve outside the patient.An attempt was made to set the revolutions; however, the number of revolutions could not be read on the rotablator console.The rotalink plus was running for seconds.The physician felt a sharp pain on the thumb that was holding the sheath of the rotalink plus burr.Two small holes were observed on the sheath.Difficulty removing the rotalink plus from the rotawire occurred; therefore both devices were removed together as one.The tip of the rotawire was torn off into two short pieces and remain in the distal circumflex artery.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.It was further reported that the target lesion in the proximal circumflex was moderately tortuous and severely calcified.The detached rotawire pieces remained in the patient due to the flow of the vessel was good.The patient is scheduled to return at a later date to treat the lesion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: returned product consisted of the rotablator rotalink plus atherectomy device.The advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device revealed that the sheath was split with the burr partially within the sheath.Two holes in the sheath were identified at 123mm and 129.5mm distal from the strain relief.Functional testing was performed with the returned rotawire.The rotawire was able to be removed and reinserted into the device with resistance due to kinks in the wire.Upon inspection of the wire, it was found that the spring tip had been fractured.Product analysis confirmed the reported events, as the resistance during wire insertion and removal is attributable to the reported difficulties in removing the wire, and there was a fracture at the rotawire spring tip.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
MDR Report Key11874123
MDR Text Key252308605
Report Number2134265-2021-06694
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729316411
UDI-Public08714729316411
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/01/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/01/2021
Device Model Number3241
Device Catalogue Number3241
Device Lot Number0024857703
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/09/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/18/2021
Initial Date FDA Received05/25/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/25/2021
06/24/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/08/2021
07/01/2021
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
GUIDE CATHETER: FINECROSS; GUIDE CATHETER: FINECROSS; GUIDE CATHETER: FINECROSS; GUIDE CATHETER: FINECROSS
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-