A review of the returned device was conducted.Upon removal of the device from the packaging, only the balloon was returned.The catheter shaft was not provided and the introducer sheath used in the case was also not provided.The balloon appeared to be separated from the shaft of the location of the proximal balloon weld.The diameter of the weld was smaller due to the stretching of the material prior to the weld breakage.This stretching is caused when the physician applies to much force during withdrawal that ultimately resulted in the shaft separation from the balloon.The condition of the balloon shows that the balloon had entered the sheath to the point of the bolus of fluid as the balloon was much larger at the distal end and is indicative of a balloon that still had fluid in it prior to withdrawal.To determine if the balloon had a leak in it that may have prevented the balloon from fully deflating, a toughly borst adapter was placed on to the small piece of shaft left on the balloon.The balloon was pressurized slightly while the distal tip was clamped off.An additional clamp was placed on the proximal weld area and steady finger pressure was applied.There were no leaks detected in the balloon.The balloon was then cut off the shaft and the skive inflation ports investigated.Both skive lumens were patent.Being that the stent was successfully deployed there is no indication that the device was not performing as intended.During the process of manufacturing the proximal balloon weld strength is tested on a sampling of 20 units from the catheter lot during the process of manufacturing.This testing requires that the balloon weld not break or separate at a force lower than 15 newton¿s as described in the product specification document.A review of the device history records shows that the proximal balloon weld minimum tensile force seen out of 20 samples was 22.8 n.This is above the 15 newton minimum requirement.Based on the details of the complaint it is plausible that enough time wasn't allowed for the balloon to deflate.In this regard, if the balloon was not fully deflated and attempted to be pulled back through the sheath the remaining fluid would get pushed into the distal balloon cone that could create a plug at the end of the introducer sheath making withdrawal difficult.It is for this reason that the balloon be fully deflated and visualized under fluoroscopy prior to withdrawing the catheter back through the sheath as specified in the instructions for use provided with the product.Being that the shaft had separated from the balloon at the proximal balloon weld it is likely the balloon was not fully deflated.
|