• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Fibrosis (3167)
Event Date 03/11/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).(b)(4).Device not returned.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Citation: european journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 248 (2020) 222226.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that the ethicon product (prolift pelvic floor repair) involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon product involved? patient demographics.
 
Event Description
It was reported in a journal article with title: laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after transvaginal mesh surgery.Pelvic organ prolapse (pop) recurrence in transvaginal mesh surgery patients has become increasingly common, due to widespread mesh use before the fda alert.The aim was to assess feasibility, effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (lscp) in recurrent pop after previous vaginal surgery with polypropylene mesh.From january 2015 to july 2018, a total of 20 patients underwent lscp for pop recurrence from a previous vaginal surgery.The mean age of these patients was 61 years.The previous vaginal surgery used 6 prolift anterior kit (ethicon.Somerville.Nj.Usa), 6 patients who were treated with a prolift anterior kit had pop recurrence which was treated with lscp.1 female patient had an anterior vaginal erosion of the mesh.After verifying cystoscopically the integrity of the bladder mucosa, she underwent transvaginal mesh removal surgery to remove as much mesh as possible and to repair the damaged tissue.After verifying in the 3 months follow-up a complete healing, lscp was performed.Due to excessive fibrosis related to the previous surgery and implanted mesh, we applied some surgical variations during lscp.No postoperative complications were observed for the lscp.Lscp suggests safety, feasible and efficacy in the treatment of recurrent pop after prior transvaginal polypropylene mesh surgery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON SARL-NEUCHATEL
puits-godet 20
neuchatel 2000
SZ   2000
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
MDR Report Key11904898
MDR Text Key263609534
Report Number2210968-2021-05078
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K013718
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/29/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/29/2021
Initial Date FDA Received05/28/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-