A customer reported to philips that a patient experienced an event of lethargy and altered mental status while receiving ventilation therapy via the respironics v60 ventilator.The customer reported that the unit was in use on a patient at the time of the reported adverse event.A philips field service engineer (fse) evaluated the device and did not duplicate the symptom.Review of the provided diagnostic (drpt) showed the device did not generate any error codes or any low leak carbon dioxide rebreathing risk alarms.However, the drpt did show the device generated several low inspiratory pressure (1207), patient disconnect (1200), proximal pressure line disconnect (1202), low oxygen supply pressure (1209), and oxygen not available (1208) alarms.No parts were replaced and the software version was upgraded to version 3.0.The device passed all performance verification tests and was placed back into use with the customer.This reporter stated that a (b)(6) years old female patient with unknown height, and weight was admitted to a hospital on an unknown date with the admitting diagnosis not reported.Relevant medical history included obstructive sleep apnea; diagnosis date not reported.Relevant concomitant medical products included at home bi-level positive airway pressure (bipap) therapy; device not reported.No relevant past drug history was reported.While admitted on an unknown date, the patient was prescribed nocturnal ventilation therapy via the respironics v60 ventilator in average volume-assured pressure support (avaps) mode, a respironics performax full-face mask; size not reported, and a medline patient circuit; model and lot number not reported.The ventilation prescription, device settings and configuration were not reported.While admitted on an unknown date, the patient was receiving nocturnal therapy via the v60 device for approximately six to seven hours, when the patient experienced an event of lethargy and altered mental status; level of consciousness not reported.The patients medication regimen was then changed; details not reported, the hospital staff noticed that the exhalation port was plugged (capped), and the device did not generate a low leak carbon dioxide rebreathing risk alarm.No relevant laboratory data was reported.The following day, the event of altered mental status resolved.On an unknown date, the patient was discharged from the hospital to an assisted living facility.To prevent possible asphyxia and to reduce the risk of co2 rebreathing, the user should use only an oro-nasal mask with an anti-asphyxia valve or a nasal mask for noninvasive ventilation, the exhalation port should not be occluded, the user should verify that the port is operational before application, and the user should inspect and verify the proper operation of the exhalation port regularly during use (respironics v60/v60 plus ventilator, user manual, publication number 1047358, revision u, september 2019, pages 1-3, 1-4, and 1-7).There was no malfunction of the device.The user did not verify the proper operation of the exhalation port, prior to the initiation of therapy, or throughout the administration of treatment.The patient's adverse event was due to the improper use of the patient circuit.
|