Internal reference: (b)(4).This case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer¿s policy.No information available.No information available.Not applicable for this device.Not applicable for this device.Country is (b)(6).The record's reportability decision was incorrectly documented, resulting in a late mdr.The visions pv.018 catheter was visually and microscopically inspected.The distal tip was broken in two parts with rough edges of malleable shaft material observed.The two broken portions of the distal tip were accounted for and measured at 14 mm.The probable cause of the reported tip separation is damage in use, likely from excessive pulling force, as evidenced by the stretched material observed at the distal tip.Strain, impact, and forces associated with handling may affect the integrity of the device.Do not apply to this submission.
|
It was reported that during a peripheral procedure for an evt treatment of the calcified iliac artery, the manufacturer's catheter separated 2 cm from the distal tip with no force applied during removal from the patient.When it separated, the distal tip was just outside of the hemostasis valve of the sheath.No patient injury reported.This product problem is being submitted because a distal tip separation has a potential for harm if the malfunction were to recur.
|