MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCON
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 3058 |
Device Problems
Intermittent Continuity (1121); Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); Energy Output Problem (1431); Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate (1496); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Impedance Problem (2950); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Electric Shock (2554); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 01/01/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Concomitant medical products: product id: 3889-28, lot#: va200bv, implanted: (b)(6) 2019, explanted: (b)(6) 2020.Product type lead.Date is estimated; year is valid.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient via manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable ne urostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stim and gastrointestinal/ pelvic floor.It was reported that the patient lost symptom control after 1-1.5 years.The battery was stated by the provider that it would not hold a program change due to battery failure.Impedances were all out of limits until they were run at "a high amplitude and pulse width," then they were within normal limits.The patient was set at 1.0 volts with vagina sensation on program 6 - electrode 1<(>&<)>2 (-), and 0 (+).They tried to change the setting on the battery and they would not save.The provider called it a "battery failure." the lead and ins were explanted/removed and replaced with a competitor's system.The issue was resolved at the time of the report.The patient called the manufacturer representative to inquire about the warranty of the implants.A message was left with the warranty department to obtain information for the patient.Additional information was received from a healthcare professional (hcp) via a manufacturer representative (rep).It was reported that the impedances that were out of normal limits were not documented as high or low by the provider, and they did not remember.When asked to clarify what was happening, the provider responded, "the implant would shut off randomly and then zap [the patient] again and then not work." the reason why was unknown and never determined.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|