• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIGTRSB60AXT
Device Problems Misfire (2532); Separation Failure (2547); Failure to Cut (2587)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/24/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic gastric sleeve, at the first fire on the pylorus, the reload did not fully fire, and the stapler stopped with about 4mm left of the reload to fire.It paused without giving an excessive force indicator.It appeared that the stapler stopped abnormally.The user had to cut the buttress off of the reload because the knife did not pass through and cut the anchoring suture and attached another reload to resolve the issue.There was no patient injury.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic gastric sleeve, at the first fire on the pylorus, the reload did not fully fire, the stapler stopped with about 4mm left of the reload to fire.It paused without giving an excessive force indicator.It appeared that the stapler stopped abnormally.The user held down the fire button for it to re calibrate but the knife blade did not advance the last 2-3mm to cut the anchoring suture and fully complete the fire.The user had to cut the buttress off of the reload and cut the anchoring suture.Another reload and the same handle, shell and adapter was used to resolve the issue.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5, g3 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the device to be partially fired.Functionally, the reload was loaded into a representative instrument.The interlock was overridden.The reload was fully cycled without hesitation or binding.The reload interlock was tested and found to function properly.It was reported that the device initially fires but failed to complete the firing cycle, the knife advances but did not fully cut through the tissue, and the reinforcement material did not release from the device as expected after firing.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: in the event of an incomplete firing of the endo gia¿ reinforced reload with tri-staple¿ technology, the distal maxon¿ anchoring sutures used to secure the staple line reinforcement material to the anvil and cartridge may not be released, the inability to release the distal anchor suture will prevent the jaws from opening fully when the device is unclamped.The remaining intact staple line reinforcement material on the reload will need to be removed from the device by gentle traction and/or by cutting the anchor suture with scissors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Type of Device
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
MDR Report Key11998681
MDR Text Key256173669
Report Number1219930-2021-02366
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10884521717633
UDI-Public10884521717633
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K173270
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/11/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2024
Device Model NumberSIGTRSB60AXT
Device Catalogue NumberSIGTRSB60AXT
Device Lot NumberN1B0153Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/24/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/24/2021
Initial Date FDA Received06/15/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/29/2021
07/26/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/20/2021
08/11/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-