• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD® INLAY OPTIMA® URETERAL STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD® INLAY OPTIMA® URETERAL STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 788626
Device Problem Incorrect Measurement (1383)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/28/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the proximal tip of the stent looks snub nosed like not tapered through the cystoscope.Another physician thought they have a fat end instead of a gentle taper like they are used to.Noted that the stent was removed and tagged as defective.As per follow up received on 05jun2021, inlay optima stent failed during the procedure.No patient injury was caused.No medical intervention was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event is unconfirmed as the device met specifications.The used ureteral stent and suture were returned in the original packaging.No visible defects were noted on the returned sample and both ends were observed to be tipped (tapered).The device was used for treatment purposes.As the device met product specifications there does not appear to be a relationship between the event and the device.As the reported event is unconfirmed, a dhr review is not required.As the reported event is unconfirmed, a label/packaging review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was evaluated.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the proximal tip of the stent looks snub nosed like not tapered through the cystoscope.Another physician thought they have a fat end instead of a gentle taper like they are used to.Noted that the stent was removed and tagged as defective.As per follow up received on 05jun2021, inlay optima stent failed during the procedure.No patient injury was caused.No medical intervention was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARD® INLAY OPTIMA® URETERAL STENT
Type of Device
URETERAL STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer Contact
yonic anderson
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key12050933
MDR Text Key257823288
Report Number1018233-2021-03739
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00801741015762
UDI-Public(01)00801741015762
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K043193
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/19/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number788626
Device Catalogue Number788626
Device Lot NumberNGFP0947
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/21/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/01/2021
Initial Date FDA Received06/23/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/19/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/07/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/18/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-