Model Number 788626 |
Device Problem
Incorrect Measurement (1383)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/28/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the proximal tip of the stent looks snub nosed like not tapered through the cystoscope.Another physician thought they have a fat end instead of a gentle taper like they are used to.Noted that the stent was removed and tagged as defective.As per follow up received on 05jun2021, inlay optima stent failed during the procedure.No patient injury was caused.No medical intervention was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event is unconfirmed as the device met specifications.The used ureteral stent and suture were returned in the original packaging.No visible defects were noted on the returned sample and both ends were observed to be tipped (tapered).The device was used for treatment purposes.As the device met product specifications there does not appear to be a relationship between the event and the device.As the reported event is unconfirmed, a dhr review is not required.As the reported event is unconfirmed, a label/packaging review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was evaluated.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the proximal tip of the stent looks snub nosed like not tapered through the cystoscope.Another physician thought they have a fat end instead of a gentle taper like they are used to.Noted that the stent was removed and tagged as defective.As per follow up received on 05jun2021, inlay optima stent failed during the procedure.No patient injury was caused.No medical intervention was reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|