• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVPROPLUS-23US
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/10/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the valve was discarded, therefore no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that prior to the implant of a transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, during the valve load process, a mi sload occurred and the frame of the valve became distorted.The frame of the valve fractured and a stent fracture was noted.The valve and delivery catheter system (dcs) were not used for implant.The valve and the dcs were replaced and the procedure was completed.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that the frame fracture was not present out of box.The fracture occurred prior to the misload and was confirmed before docking the valve.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the valve was not returned; therefore no product analysis could be performed.One image was provided to medtronic for review.The image provided showed a frame fracture in between frame cells c86 and c87, confirming the reported event.Loading of the valve is a process in which the outcome is highly dependent on the operator experience and technique; the evolut system instructions for use (ifu) contains instructions to use the integrated loading bath which features a mirror to ensure that all bioprosthesis outflow struts are symmetrical and captured in the capsule during loading and to aid in accurate placement of the transcatheter aortic valve (tav) frame paddles during loading.In addition, the ifu instructs to visually and tactilely inspect the capsule for a misloaded bioprosthesis.In this case, frame fracture was reported to have occurred prior to the misload but after the valve was removed from the box and inspected.Based on the limited information available, a conclusive root cause for the frame fracture could not be determined.However, the loading process may have been a contributing cause as a misload had occurred.Review of the device history record (dhr, (b)(6)) and frame record (1137446) for this device found it was built to specification and met all inspection and acceptance criteria.No issues were noted that would have impacted this event.There is no information to suggest a device quality deficiency that may have caused or contributed to this event.This event does not allege a device misuse or malfunction occurred.Updated h6 - eval method, eval results and eval conclusion codes.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
MDR Report Key12092258
MDR Text Key262717213
Report Number2025587-2021-02038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/18/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/09/2022
Device Model NumberEVPROPLUS-23US
Device Catalogue NumberEVPROPLUS-23US
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/10/2021
Initial Date FDA Received06/30/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/07/2021
08/17/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/12/2021
08/18/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-