• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD MID-C 105L; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM,,,

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD MID-C 105L; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM,,, Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 105L
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Physical Asymmetry (4573)
Event Date 06/23/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
First investigation: 1.1.Production process analysis: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to specification.1.2.User (surgeon and patient) information analysis: the x-ray demonstrates that the system reached its maximal elongation, which is the weakest point of the rod.In this position, the transverse process below the implant may generate a force acting on the system that can cause the rod breakage.As part of apifix commitment to continuous improvement, capa #(b)(4) was initiated to further investigate to prevent and minimize the rate of implant breakage.The company investigation indicated that implant breakage can result from trauma, practicing severe sports, development of hyper-kyphosis, inserting the pedicle screws in a wrong trajectory, not working according to the surgical technique, and most commonly from the implant reaching its end of the way.Breakages were evident in 3 main regions, the implant base, the main rod, and the rod's connection to the poly-axial joint.The most common point of failure was the implant rod in implants reaching their maximal elongation.2.Corrective action: over the years, the company already implemented corrective action with the following: in nov 2017, all surgeons received a letter detailing the importance of screw insertion trajectory.The topic is also covered in the company's training presentation.Eco-38, replaced the mid-c 125 that extends by 40 mm to mid-c 125 that extends by 50mm allowing more overlap between the pole and base.Eco-46, a trial tool was added to the surgical tools to aid the surgeon in detecting if access tissue remains below the implant.In march 2020, the topic of practicing severe sports was added to the mid-c training presentation.3.Risk assessment: 3.1.The current device breakage rate due to any reason is 3.6% and is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's clinical evaluation report ( 0.2%- 15.5%) ( cer dms-727 rev t).The risk of the broken rod has been assessed and found to be acceptable ((b)(4)).3.2.The current curve progression rate is 2.8%.
 
Event Description
The distributer reported by e-mail that apifix implant was removed due to cureve progression.The x-ray and the removed implant demonstrates breakage of the pole part at the end of the way.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 105L
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM,,,
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
adi prager
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key12202230
MDR Text Key262631448
Report Number3013461531-2021-00027
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSN
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/20/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date09/25/2022
Device Model NumberMID-C 105L
Device Catalogue NumberAF 205L
Device Lot NumberAF 09-01-17
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/28/2021
Initial Date FDA Received07/21/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured09/25/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-