• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INOGEN EL ICD VR; IMPLANTABLE DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INOGEN EL ICD VR; IMPLANTABLE DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number D140
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Failure to Capture (1081); Failure to Sense (1559); Low impedance (2285); Impedance Problem (2950); Data Problem (3196); Migration (4003)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/30/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Information indicates this device is currently in the possession of a boston scientific representative and will be returned.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) system exhibited a change in the sensing morphology on stored electrograms where it appeared that the patient no longer had an intrinsic rhythm.Attempts were made over several months to have the patient come into the clinic for an evaluation, testing and possible device programming optimization.However, the patient did not come to scheduled follow up appointments.Subsequently, there were additional observations of no sensing, no capture and poor impedance measurements on the right ventricular (rv) lead.There were also stored episodes which exhibited various types of noise and the shock impedance measurements were less than 10 ohms since approximately one month after system implant.These shock impedance measurements are low and out of range.The patient is very large and soon after system implant when the patient sat up, it appeared that the icd device had migrated.With the patient subsequently in the clinic, a new x-ray was performed.The device and rv lead were found to have migrated and the rv lead was dislodged.Due to the patients non-compliance with attending scheduled follow up appointments, the physician elected to explant the icd device and rv lead and not replace the system.There were no additional adverse patient effects.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Information indicates this device is currently in the possession of a boston scientific representative and will be returned.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.The returned device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted scratches and tool marks on the case.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the defibrillation, pacing, and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed, and all measurements were within normal limits.The device operated appropriately with no interruptions in therapy output at the returned programmed settings.A series of electrical tests was also performed, and again, normal device function was observed.Device migration is a known issue for implanted devices.Analysis of the returned product is not able to provide relevant information pertinent to this type of allegation.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) system exhibited a change in the sensing morphology on stored electrograms where it appeared that the patient no longer had an intrinsic rhythm.Attempts were made over several months to have the patient come into the clinic for an evaluation, testing and possible device programming optimization.However, the patient did not come to scheduled follow up appointments.Subsequently, there were additional observations of no sensing, no capture and poor impedance measurements on the right ventricular (rv) lead.There were also stored episodes which exhibited various types of noise and the shock impedance measurements were less than 10 ohms since approximately one month after system implant.These shock impedance measurements are low and out of range.The patient is very large and soon after system implant when the patient sat up, it appeared that the icd device had migrated.With the patient subsequently in the clinic, a new x-ray was performed.The device and rv lead were found to have migrated and the rv lead was dislodged.Due to the patients non-compliance with attending scheduled follow up appointments, the physician elected to explant the icd device and rv lead and not replace the system.There were no additional adverse patient effects.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INOGEN EL ICD VR
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key12218327
MDR Text Key263171030
Report Number2124215-2021-20634
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWS
UDI-Device Identifier00802526534201
UDI-Public00802526534201
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P960040/S306
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/26/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/04/2022
Device Model NumberD140
Device Catalogue NumberD140
Device Lot Number265983
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/01/2021
Initial Date FDA Received07/23/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/17/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/26/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/13/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age37 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-