|
Model Number 3241 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Entrapment of Device (1212); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/21/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that device detachment occurred during preparation.The eccentric target lesion area was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified left anterior descending artery.A rotablator rotalink plus 1.25mm burr and 330cm rotawire were selected for use.During the draw process outside the patient, resistance was encountered when advancing the rotawire through the rotalink plus.The rotawire became stuck inside the rotalink plus.The physician forcefully withdrew the devices.The proximal end of the rotalink plus detached.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported and the patient is stable.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that device detachment occurred during preparation.The eccentric target lesion area was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified left anterior descending artery.A rotablator rotalink plus 1.25mm burr and 330cm rotawire were selected for use.During the draw process outside the patient, resistance was encountered when advanciing the rotawire through the rotalink plus.The rotawire became stuck inside the rotalink plus.The physician forcefully withdrew the devices.The proximal end of the rotalink plus detached.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complicatons reported and the patient is stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device did not reveal any damages or defects.The wire used in the procedure was received, so the wire used in the procedure was also used for functional testing.The returned rotawire was able to be removed from the rotablator device, but was not able to be reinserted due to kinks at 2cm and 19cm from the proximal end of the wire.The rotablator advancer was then connected to the rotablator console control system.When the foot pedal was pressed, the advancer was able to reach and maintain optimal rpm without resistance or issues.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
F6 device codes corrected from detachment of device or device component a0501 to break a0401.Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device did not reveal any damages or defects.The wire used in the procedure was received, so the wire used in the procedure was also used for functional testing.The returned rotawire was able to be removed from the rotablator device, but was not able to be reinserted due to kinks at 2cm and 19cm from the proximal end of the wire.The rotablator advancer was then connected to the rotablator console control system.When the foot pedal was pressed, the advancer was able to reach and maintain optimal rpm without resistance or issues.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that device detachment occurred during preparation.The eccentric target lesion area was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified left anterior descending artery.A rotablator rotalink plus 1.25mm burr and 330cm rotawire were selected for use.During the draw process outside the patient, resistance was encountered when advancing the rotawire through the rotalink plus.The rotawire became stuck inside the rotalink plus.The physician forcefully withdrew the devices.The proximal end of the rotalink plus detached.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported and the patient is stable.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|