Date of event: unknown.The date received by manufacturer has been used for this field.Investigation summary: one sample was provided to our quality team for investigation.Upon visual inspection, the needle was observed to be bent; therefore the reported failure could be verified.It was noted there was a perforation in the packaging at the same location where the needle was bent.A device history review was performed for reported lot 2002008, no deviations or non-conformances were identified during the manufacturing process that could have contributed to this issue.Five retained samples of the same lot were also used for additional evaluation.All product was visually inspected, no damage or defects were observed on any of the needles.Product is inspected throughout the manufacturing process according to procedure, verifying all critical dimensions are within specification and there is no damage or defects with the product.All records were reviewed and no issues were identified during inspections for the reported lot.While we cannot identify a direct issue, based on the sample evaluation it was determined this incident is related to a jam within the packaging machine, personnel not properly identifying the damaged product during their inspections.Manufacturing personnel have been notified of this incident to increase awareness during inspections.Complaints received for this device and reported issue will continue to be tracked and trended for future occurrence.
|
It was reported that the spinal needle 22ga 3.50 in packaging had a tear in it, compromising the product's sterility.The following information was provided by the initial reporter, translated from french to english: "the needle bent at the level of the hub." via bd investigation: "it can be observed that the packaging film has a perforation right in the same place where the needle starts to bend.".
|