Livanova received a report that on june 30 it was difficult to visualize the protek duo veno-venous cannula which was inserted on june 28.A cxr was conducted and reportedly it appeared to be in a good position, possibly little low.It was stated that based on anatomy during cannulation, pulmonary artery bifurcation appears to be lower than expected.On july 1, an episode of decreased flow followed by brief asystole was reported.Ecmo catheter was slightly low on cxr and decision was made to convert bi-femoral.Sudden episode of chattering followed later on.Flow went down to 0.8 and then recovered to 3.4 without intervention.10 seconds later, hr and arterial bp declined to 0.Hr and bp also recovered without intervention.Entire episode lasted approximately 30 seconds.Patient chattered again while intensivist group was at bedside to evaluate, flow dropped to 0.6 and then recovered.The patient was bradycardic in 50s and 0.5 mg atropine was given.Precedex drip was discontinued and ketamine infusion was ordered.Hds for 5 mins then vv ecmo chattered then flows dropped to 0 and patient became bradycardic to 20s but improved to 60s s/p atropine dose.Flows recovered independently.Lr 500 ml bolus given and rpm reduced to 4800 from 5000.Cxr ordered and echo were done to evaluate rv outflow track and pulm valve to confirm cannula placement.On july 2, cxr identified that distal tip of protek duo cannula was not in good position.It was decided to proceed with bi-femoral vv ecmo cannulation followed by decannulation of rij protek cannula.Cpr initiated and rosc obtained after administration of epinephrine x 1.Given 0.5mg atropine prior to removal of rij vv ecmo cannula in anticipation of bradycardia with removal.Right neck cannulation vv ecmo has migrated back into the right ventricle, proximal port in right svc.Flows have been reportedly marginal overnight.With drop in flow, patient ecmo dependent, developed hypoxemia and transient asystole.The staff decided to move to cath lab and recannulate, place a new circuit and bilateral femoral catheters.
|
H.10: the cannula was not made available for return, thus no investigation could be performed.Based on the information available and on the fact that no defect of the cannula was mentioned, the most likely root cause of the reported event can be: cannula migration due to patient movements and/or.Cannula not properly secured to the patient.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
|