A customer in (b)(6) alleged the generation of a (b)(6) result for a donation tested with the cobas taqscreen mpx test, v2.0.The donation was transfused into a recipient, who was confirmed to be (b)(6) by the local center of infectious disease.An investigation is on-going.
|
The current investigation of the kit lots, including review of the qc kit release and manufacturing records, did not confirm a product issue.Roche¿s medical affairs department was consulted and following assessment was provided.The april 15th donation was reportedly seronegative and nat negative in a pool of 6 on the cobas taqscreen mpx test, v2.0.Based on reported results of later samples from the donor and recipient, it seems that the donor developed an hiv infection and most likely had a very early hiv infection at the time of the april donation.Given that this was a very early infection, prior to the development of antibodies, it is likely that the viral concentration at the time of the april donation was very low.It is reported that a new blood draw on june 30th was hiv positive on cobas taqscreen mpx test, v2.0.This indicates that the infection is detectable with the cobas taqscreen mpx test, v2.0 and suggests that the initial non-detection was indeed related to a low viral load and not due to a sequence variation.The donor sample was requested for further evaluation and investigation; however, upon arrival, it was noted to have thawed during transport.As such, since the sample quality and integrity was compromised, investigative testing of the sample was not pursued.Per the instructions for use, detection of hiv-1 group m rna, hiv-1 group o rna, hiv-2 rna, hcv rna, and hbv dna is dependent on the number of virus particles present in the specimen and may be affected by specimen collection methods, storage, patient factors (i.E.Age, presence of symptoms), and/or stage of infection and pool size.(b)(4).
|