The alleged complaint could not be confirmed.Based on the provided information, the patient was revised due to multiple dislocations, which appears to have contributed to fracture of the ceramic femoral head.Additionally, the modular neck was indicated to have worn due to complications concerning the femoral head.These products had been implanted for approximately 198 months at the time of occurrence.The revised products were not returned for investigation.No images, radiographs, or operative notes were provided to confirm this complaint.Review of the dhrs for the known lots indicates that these products were manufactured to specification.Furthermore, there were no other reported complaints involving the known lots.The microport hip systems package insert (150803-8) lists "dislocation, migration and/or subluxation of prosthetic components from improper positioning, trauma, loss of fixation and/or muscle and fibrous tissue laxity" and "allergic reactions to materials; metal sensitivity; or reactions to wear debris that may lead to histological reactions, pseudotumor and aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesions (alval)" as possible adverse effects of total hip arthroplasty.It also states, "fatigue fracture of the prosthetic component can occur as a result of trauma, strenuous activity, improper alignment, incomplete implant seating, duration of service, loss of fixation, non-union, or excessive weight." no conclusions can be made from the available information.There were no trends identified per mpo trending procedures.This issue will continue to be monitored through complaint tracking.
|
Allegedly, the patient was revised due to breakage multiple dislocations.Also, pseudotumor was found due to neck wear.The report states that revision is due to multiple dislocations and as a consequence caused head breakage.Due to the head breakage, the neck wore.
|