The device was evaluated at olympus (b)(4).As a result of the evaluation, the following was confirmed.The phenomenon reported by the user facility was not reproduced.The lower part of the front panel was deformed.The damper was damaged.The device has not been repaired in the last year.The exact cause of the phenomenon that the device did not supply air could not be conclusively determined, since the phenomenon could not be reproduced.However, it may have been caused by a temporary malfunction of the internal board or an influence other than the device.In addition, the device did not turn on due to a failure of the main board.The exact cause of the main board failure could not be conclusively determined, because the device has not been returned to omsc.However, it may have failed due to deterioration over time, because five years and two months have passed since the device was manufactured.Device history record (dhr) review indicates that the product was manufactured and tested in accordance with all applicable procedures and met all final product release criteria.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented.
|