• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EBI, LLC. SPINALPAK ASSEMBLY; STIMULATOR, SPINAL PAK, NON-INVASIVE (72R ELECTRODES)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EBI, LLC. SPINALPAK ASSEMBLY; STIMULATOR, SPINAL PAK, NON-INVASIVE (72R ELECTRODES) Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Itching Sensation (1943); Rash (2033); Blister (4537); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Zimmer biomet complaint (b)(4).Date of event: the event occurred sometime in (b)(6) 2021.Surgical procedures: posterior lumbar fusion using bilateral peek expandable grafts with interbody arthrodesis l4-l5, l5-s1 performed on (b)(6) 2021.Medical product: pedicle screws.Medical product: pedicle rod.Medical product: biomet polaris t.Therapy date: unknown.The device will not be returned for analysis; however, an investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation is complete, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient experienced skin irritation while using the 72r electrodes.The irritation started (b)(6) 2021, the skin was itchy and red, there were blisters and welts, with no swelling.The patient does not have sensitive skin.The patient had lupus, erythromycin, and naprosyn.The patient contacted the doctor in (b)(6) 2021 and informed him of the irritation.The doctor advised to take off the electrodes for few days and try again with the treatment.It was reported in (b)(6) 2021 that the patient is having an allergic reaction to the 72r electrodes and does not appear to be able to wear the unit due to skin irritation.The patient later reported that she started having issues with the 63b electrodes after wearing them for 4 hrs.The patient said that she could not use the unit at all.The patient had confirmed, in (b)(6) 2021, that the doctor was not happy that the 63b electrodes (and 72r electrodes) caused irritation and blisters.The doctor decided that it was best to stop treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The device was returned to zimvie for investigation.The reported event was not verifiable after the investigation associated with skin irritation.The device history record was reviewed and no discrepancies related to the reported event were found.No physical and/or functional condition could be found after the dhr that could be considered a causal factor for the reported complaint.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly zimvie will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Event Description
T was reported that the patient experienced skin irritation while using the 72r electrodes.The irritation started (b)(6) 2021, the skin was itchy and red, there were blisters and welts, with no swelling.The patient does not have sensitive skin.The patient had lupus, erythromycin, and naprosyn.The patient contacted the doctor in (b)(6) 2021 and informed him of the irritation.The doctor advised to take off the electrodes for few days and try again with the treatment.It was reported in april 2021 that the patient is having an allergic reaction to the 72r electrodes and does not appear to be able to wear the unit due to skin irritation.The patient later reported that she started having issues with the 63b electrodes after wearing them for 4 hrs.The patient said that she could not use the unit at all.The patient had confirmed, in (b)(6) 2021, that the doctor was not happy that the 63b electrodes (and 72r electrodes) caused irritation and blisters.The doctor decided that it was best to stop treatment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPINALPAK ASSEMBLY
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL PAK, NON-INVASIVE (72R ELECTRODES)
Manufacturer (Section D)
EBI, LLC.
1 gatehall dr
parsippany NJ 07054
Manufacturer (Section G)
EBI, LLC.
1 gatehall dr
parsippany NJ 07054
Manufacturer Contact
stephanie smith
1 gatehall dr
parsippany, NJ 07054
9732999300
MDR Report Key12326967
MDR Text Key267278600
Report Number0002242816-2021-00139
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOF
UDI-Device Identifier00812301020201
UDI-Public00812301020201
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P850022
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number1067716
Device Lot Number020701
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/02/2021
Initial Date FDA Received08/16/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/04/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10 NARRATIVE
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-