|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Itching Sensation (1943); Rash (2033); Blister (4537); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Zimmer biomet complaint (b)(4).Date of event: the event occurred sometime in (b)(6) 2021.Surgical procedures: posterior lumbar fusion using bilateral peek expandable grafts with interbody arthrodesis l4-l5, l5-s1 performed on (b)(6) 2021.Medical product: pedicle screws.Medical product: pedicle rod.Medical product: biomet polaris t.Therapy date: unknown.The device will not be returned for analysis; however, an investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation is complete, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient experienced skin irritation while using the 72r electrodes.The irritation started (b)(6) 2021, the skin was itchy and red, there were blisters and welts, with no swelling.The patient does not have sensitive skin.The patient had lupus, erythromycin, and naprosyn.The patient contacted the doctor in (b)(6) 2021 and informed him of the irritation.The doctor advised to take off the electrodes for few days and try again with the treatment.It was reported in (b)(6) 2021 that the patient is having an allergic reaction to the 72r electrodes and does not appear to be able to wear the unit due to skin irritation.The patient later reported that she started having issues with the 63b electrodes after wearing them for 4 hrs.The patient said that she could not use the unit at all.The patient had confirmed, in (b)(6) 2021, that the doctor was not happy that the 63b electrodes (and 72r electrodes) caused irritation and blisters.The doctor decided that it was best to stop treatment.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The device was returned to zimvie for investigation.The reported event was not verifiable after the investigation associated with skin irritation.The device history record was reviewed and no discrepancies related to the reported event were found.No physical and/or functional condition could be found after the dhr that could be considered a causal factor for the reported complaint.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly zimvie will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
T was reported that the patient experienced skin irritation while using the 72r electrodes.The irritation started (b)(6) 2021, the skin was itchy and red, there were blisters and welts, with no swelling.The patient does not have sensitive skin.The patient had lupus, erythromycin, and naprosyn.The patient contacted the doctor in (b)(6) 2021 and informed him of the irritation.The doctor advised to take off the electrodes for few days and try again with the treatment.It was reported in april 2021 that the patient is having an allergic reaction to the 72r electrodes and does not appear to be able to wear the unit due to skin irritation.The patient later reported that she started having issues with the 63b electrodes after wearing them for 4 hrs.The patient said that she could not use the unit at all.The patient had confirmed, in (b)(6) 2021, that the doctor was not happy that the 63b electrodes (and 72r electrodes) caused irritation and blisters.The doctor decided that it was best to stop treatment.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|