• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. NSK; SCALER, ULTRASONIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. NSK; SCALER, ULTRASONIC Back to Search Results
Model Number V10
Device Problems Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Separation Problem (4043)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/02/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The dentist refused to provide any information about the patient.
 
Event Description
On august 2, 2021, nakanishi received a phone call from a distributor about a malfunction of an nsk product.Details are as follows.The event occurred on (b)(6) 2021.The dentist was performing a dental procedure on a patient using a tip connected to the v10 tip holder (lot no.0kx).During the procedure, the tip suddenly separated from the tip holder and fell into the patient's mouth.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On september 6, 2021, nakanishi received additional information about the event.The procedure the dentist was performing at the time of the event was an implant maintenance procedure.The dentist checked the connection between the tip and tip holder by pulling them prior to use.The patient was not under anesthesia.No injury was caused to the patient in the event.Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device [report no.C210802-01].These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: a) nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject v10 device [lot no.0kx].There were no problems observed during manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.There were also no repair history records since the device was shipped.B) nakanishi set the returned tip and tip holder in a company-owned handpiece connected to a company-owned unit and activated the tip at maximum power to observe whether or not the reported event could be replicated.Nakanishi observed neither tip separation from the tip holder nor an abnormal connection between the tip and tip holder during the operation test.C) nakanishi disassembled the tip holder and performed a visual inspection of the internal parts.Nakanishi did not observe any abnormality, such as scratches, deformation, or abrasion.The inner diameter of the tip holder when inserting a tip also met company criteria.Then, nakanishi performed a visual inspection of the v-p10 tip.The tip had no abnormalities, such as abrasion of the working part or shaft, and the diameter of the shaft was within the device specification.D) nakanishi took photographs of all the disassembled parts and kept them in investigation report no.C210802-01.Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: a) nakanishi could not identify the exact cause of the tip separation from the returned device because nakanishi was not able to replicate the reported event and did not observe any abnormalities in the visual inspection.B) nakanishi did not identify the cause, but based on no abnormalities observed in the visual inspection, as well as many years of experience, nakanishi considers the possibility that the cause of the tip separation is that the tip was not firmly tightened in the tip holder.C) misuse by the user led to loose tightening of the tip, which contributed to the bur separation.D) in order to prevent a recurrence of the tip separation, nakanishi took the following actions: d.1) nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed the clarity and understandability of the instructions.D.2) nakanishi reported the above evaluation results to the dentist, and reminded the dentist of the importance of using and checking the device prior to use to prevent the bur separation, as instructed in the operation manual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NSK
Type of Device
SCALER, ULTRASONIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA  322-8666
MDR Report Key12357134
MDR Text Key269517485
Report Number9611253-2021-00050
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ELC
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K113530
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberV10
Device Catalogue NumberZ217041
Device Lot Number0KX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/03/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/02/2021
Initial Date FDA Received08/23/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/26/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/21/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-