• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 14B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 14B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXMC14
Device Problems Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815)
Event Date 08/04/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Additional information received: patient dilation date (b)(6) 2021.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? what is the product code for the linx device that was removed? what is the lot number of the linx device? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunization drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia? besides the reported dysphagia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? if information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a linx device was explanted due to dysphagia.All available information was provided at the time of the call.There is no further information available now or in the future.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 9/23/2021 an analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.As part of ethicon's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.The dhr for lot 25106 was reviewed.No ncs, defects, or reworks related to the product complaint were found.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) date sent: 9/16/2021 lot number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? yes she had all 3 studies egd showed small hh normal manometry ph 61.7 demeester.What is the product code for the linx device that was removed? lxmc14.What is the lot number of the linx device? 25106.When using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? measured ge junction and up 1-2 sizes.Did the patient have an autoimmune disease? no.Is the patient currently taking steroids / immunization drugs? yes takes steroids.Did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? no.How severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? no.Was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? yes.Were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia? chest pain.Besides the reported dysphagia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? chest pain.Was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? yes.D1 & d4.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 12/7/2021.Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Significant tooling marks were observed on links and beads.This could've been caused by the tools used during the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.No further investigation will be conducted on this complaint as the device is found to meet the specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 14B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview 55126
6107428552
MDR Report Key12358710
MDR Text Key267832800
Report Number3008766073-2021-00176
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/10/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/24/2023
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC14
Device Lot Number25106
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/16/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/10/2021
Initial Date FDA Received08/24/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/01/2021
09/23/2021
11/16/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/16/2021
09/23/2021
12/07/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/24/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age45 YR
-
-