|
Catalog Number LXMC14 |
Device Problems
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Chest Pain (1776); Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815)
|
Event Date 08/04/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Additional information received: patient dilation date (b)(6) 2021.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? what is the product code for the linx device that was removed? what is the lot number of the linx device? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunization drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia? besides the reported dysphagia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? if information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a linx device was explanted due to dysphagia.All available information was provided at the time of the call.There is no further information available now or in the future.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 9/23/2021 an analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.As part of ethicon's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.The dhr for lot 25106 was reviewed.No ncs, defects, or reworks related to the product complaint were found.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4) date sent: 9/16/2021 lot number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? yes she had all 3 studies egd showed small hh normal manometry ph 61.7 demeester.What is the product code for the linx device that was removed? lxmc14.What is the lot number of the linx device? 25106.When using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? measured ge junction and up 1-2 sizes.Did the patient have an autoimmune disease? no.Is the patient currently taking steroids / immunization drugs? yes takes steroids.Did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? no.How severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? no.Was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? yes.Were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia? chest pain.Besides the reported dysphagia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? chest pain.Was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? yes.D1 & d4.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 12/7/2021.Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Significant tooling marks were observed on links and beads.This could've been caused by the tools used during the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.No further investigation will be conducted on this complaint as the device is found to meet the specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|