• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION LYNX SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION LYNX SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR Back to Search Results
Model Number M0068503001
Device Problem Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157)
Patient Problems Arrhythmia (1721); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Dyspareunia (4505)
Event Date 08/12/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The surgeon is: (b)(6).(b)(4).The excised mesh is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a problem analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a lynx suprapubic sling system was implanted into the patient during a mid-urethral sling placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014 to treat female stress urinary incontinence.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient was seen for mesh related pain.On exam, there was no mesh exposure noted but the patient had an extreme pelvic pain.The patient mentioned that she was experiencing pain since she had the mid-urethral sling surgery and had dyspareunia.Also, she was very emotional and upset about the whole experience.However, the patient stated that the sling was working and she did not have any leakage.After thorough discussion of all the patient's options to manage her pelvic pain, including conservative measures, the patient wanted to undergo a surgical excision of her prior mesh.The physician discussed the risks and benefits with the patient.All of the patient's questions were answered to her satisfaction, expressed understanding, and agreed with the surgical plan.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent an exam under anesthesia, revision/excision of prior retropubic mid-urethral sling, excision of scar tissue, and cystourethroscopy procedure to treat her pelvic pain subsequent to placement of mid-urethral sling.During the procedure, a 2 cm incision was made in the mid-urethra using a scalpel where the prior retropubic sling was placed.During this dissection, something hard could be palpated distally that felt like the prior mesh.Using meticulous dissection with metzenbaum scissors, a portion of the mesh was identified and was grabbed with a hemostat.The mesh was found to be bunched up and no good plane could be identified to remove the mesh in one piece.So, the mesh was excised in the middle.One edge was grabbed with the hemostat on the right side and the epithelium around it was undermined.The mesh was also gently separated from the periurethral tissue.The mesh was then grabbed at its most distal portion and trimmed as close to the pubic bone as possible.Similar steps were repeated in the opposite side.At the end of the procedure, there were no obvious mesh palpated and the scarring that was palpated preoperatively was not palpated anymore.Subsequently, an extensive irrigation was performed, and hemostasis confirmed.The vaginal epithelium was closed using a 2.0 vicryl, and then the epithelial edges were approximated using a running stitch.Moreover, hemostasis was noted afterwards.Reportedly, there were no immediate complications at the time of surgery, and post-operatively, the patient did well.In addition, the physician discussed cardiac arrhythmia at bedside with the patient and her husband, and the patient was advised to follow-up with her cardiologist.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LYNX SYSTEM
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
FREUDENBERG MEDICAL MIS INC
2301 centennial boulevard
jeffersonville IN 47130
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key12364335
MDR Text Key268021282
Report Number3005099803-2021-04309
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTN
UDI-Device Identifier08714729718956
UDI-Public08714729718956
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020110
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/25/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2016
Device Model NumberM0068503001
Device Catalogue Number8503001
Device Lot NumberML00001913
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/29/2021
Initial Date FDA Received08/25/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/18/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age53 YR
Patient Weight77
-
-