MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 3058 |
Device Problems
Electromagnetic Interference (1194); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Ambient Noise Problem (2877)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Electric Shock (2554); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 08/09/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of event: date is approximate.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stim and gastrointestinal/ pelvic floor.It was reported that a couple weeks ago patient picked up a metal object and heaved it into a junk pile.About 30 minutes later they felt a shocking sensation and jumped up out of their chair.Once in a while patient will get a shocking feeling and lift things that they probably should not be.Patient also stated they went through metal detectors a couple times without thinking about it which messed with their device.Patient also stated that they use a massage chair but place a pillow over the implant otherwise it will hurt.Patient once had a massage and they could feel the therapist pulling on the wire so patient stopped seeing that therapist and switched to one who avoids the implant area.The patient also reported they once had ultrasound heat used on their neck but could feel it in their implant area so patient discontinued this.Patient also reported they have soreness and occasionally it is a little rough to lay on the side of the implant so use pillows.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider to further address the issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Annex d code corrected to d12 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for unknown indications for use.It was reported that the most recent device was explanted on (b)(6) 2022 due to the device shocking the patient, but the shocking was stronger with this device.The caller reported that other programs were tried and sometimes it would work for a while, and then it would shock again and eventually had to be turned off. caller states that it was unknown what was causing the shocking and unknown if the devices were returned to medtronic.The caller also mentioned, that although the device was sutured in the pocket, they feel like it came loose from the pocket was just laid under the skin and it hurt.Caller reported an instance of having a wet rag in their hand and "touching a" metal wall and the sensation threw the patient off of the chair they were in, as well as other instances of just being seated and electrical currents shooting them out of their chair.Caller stated that when the therapy was working, it was helping the symptoms and that the trial was amazing.The caller does not know if the explanted devices were returned to medtronic the circumstances that led to the reported issue were unknown.Documented reported event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|