The subject device has not been returned to omsc for evaluation but was returned to olympus (b)(4).Olympus (b)(4) checked the subject device and found that the reported phenomenon (insufflation failure) was not duplicated, however the insufflation was stopped due to the failure of the internal decompressor.In addition, it was also found that the subject device had been repaired by the third party.Omsc reviewed the manufacturing history (dhr) of the subject device and confirmed no irregularity.The exact cause of the reported phenomena (the insufflation failure and the internal decompressor failure) could not be conclusively determined.However, based upon the information from olympus (b)(4), omsc surmised that the reported insufflation failure was attributed to the failure of the main circuit board because the subject device had been repaired by the third party.And it was surmised that the reported internal decompressor failure was attributed to the something due to the repair by the third party, or the aging deterioration because ten years and nine months had passed since manufacturing.If additional information is received, this report will be supplemented.
|