As reported, after removing a roadrunner the firm hydrophilic wire guide from the package, a slight scratch on the coating of the device was discovered.The device did not make patient contact.The procedure was completed using a new product.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.There were no adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary as reported, after removing a roadrunner the firm hydrophilic wire guide from the package, a slight scratch on the coating of the device was discovered.The device did not make patient contact.The procedure was completed using a new product.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.There were no adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, manufacturing instructions, specification, and quality control procedures of the device were conducted during the investigation.No device was returned for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the cause of this event can be attributed to the transportation or storage of the device.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|