CARDIACASSIST INC. PROTEK DUO VENO-VENOUS CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 5140-4629 |
Device Problem
Crack (1135)
|
Patient Problem
Hemolysis (1886)
|
Event Date 08/20/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There was no patient involvement.Cardiacassist inc.Manufactures the xprotek duo veno-venous cannula.The incident occurred in (b)(6).The device has been requested for investigation.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
|
Event Description
|
Livanova received report that a protekduo cannula in use on patient was removed.Reportedly, the patient was having a lot of hemolysis, and it was noted that the cannula had a fracture.The support was continued using a different cannulation strategy.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H.10: through follow-up communication livanova learned that the cannula was used for a vv ecmo case which was implanted on may 30th at fransiscan st.Francis in indianapolis.The patient transferred to cleveland clinic a few weeks later.The cannula was in use for 82 days and was placed in the typical ra-pa configuration.The cannula was returned at the manufacturer site and investigated.Investigation results confirmed the crack at the distal part of the cannula near the transition area.The fracture is likely due to cyclic loading from repeated right ventricle contractions during 82 days of support in ra-pa configuration.When the cannula is in this configuration it assumes an "u" shape.When the apex of the bend in the cannula body is located at the junction between the transition region and the distal lumen, the cyclic loading from right ventricle contraction is known to cause damage.As reported in device instruction for use, the user is required to "avoid kinking in the protekduo cannula or introducer during insertion and placement within the patient¿s vasculature.Note: the area of the cannula that tapers from large to small diameter (transition region) is more susceptible to kinking than other areas.Avoid positioning this region with a tight bend radius during support." based on all information collected and product analysis, it is not possible to exclude that the cannula damage could have contributed to the reported hemolysis.However, the cannula damage was due to a prolonged use of the device (82 days) which exceeds the recommended duration of support with protek duo (30 days).
|
|
Event Description
|
See initial report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|