Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.The lot # was reviewed for complaint trend, nonconforming report and capa.Devices met specification prior to release and no trends were noted.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, the patient with this device experienced chronic pelvic pain and frequency of urine since the device was implanted.The patient has had chronic lumbosacral pain, pain in pubic bone as well as pain on palpation of the sling.Pain near her pubic bone on the right as well as deep in the vagina.There was no sign of erosion of the mesh on physical exam, despite continued perineal pain as well as pain in both legs post tot placement.Immobile, difficulty walking and going up stairs.Cystoscopy performed during which vaginal atrophy was noted, however no extrusion of the mesh was noted during exam.Subsequently, the patient continued to experience vaginal pain, pain with intercourse, muscular groin pain, leg pain, foreign material in vagina, urethral scarring.Therefore, removal of this vaginal sling was performed.At that time, removal of vulvar mesh was performed with exploration of the obturator space, urethral lysis, vaginal paravaginal, dissection and mesh removal from the deep obturator internus muscles, and anterior colporrhaphy was performed.
|