The microsensor was returned for evaluation.Device history record (dhr): there is no indication that the production process may have contributed to this complaint.All test results passed procedural specifications.Failure analysis: it was observed that the sensor diaphragm was broken (depressed square section).Therefore, no testing was possible.Root cause: the complaint was confirmed as valid.Per the supplier, the root cause is ¿mishandling of the catheter." a device history record (dhr) review, trending, and risk assessment were performed as part of the evaluation.Currently the complaint issue does not represent an adverse trend, however the issue will continue to be monitored and trended through the complaint evaluation process.The risk remains acceptable per the risk analysis.
|