• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LUTONIX, INC LUTONIX 018 DRUG COATED DILATATION CATHETER; DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LUTONIX, INC LUTONIX 018 DRUG COATED DILATATION CATHETER; DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9014
Device Problems Obstruction of Flow (2423); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problem Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 08/31/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.(expiry date: 04/2024).Device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device allegedly caused an occlusion of the distal circle and of the treated vessel.The current patient status was unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device allegedly caused an occlusion of the distal circle and of the treated vessel.The current patient status was unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported re-occlusion as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device allegedly caused an occlusion of the distal circle and of the treated vessel.The current patient status was unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the product associated with this file is not cleared for marketing or commercial distribution in the united states and does not have a similar device, therefore, the file was reassessed and no longer reportable; however an initial mdr was submitted to fda, so the reportability of the file will remain as serious injury.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported re-occlusion as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: (expiry date: 04/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional information has been received, there is a similar device approved in the us.Therfore, the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be reportable as serious injury.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported reocclusion as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 04/2024), g3.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device allegedly caused an occlusion of the distal circle and of the treated vessel.The current patient status was unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUTONIX 018 DRUG COATED DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
LUTONIX, INC
9409 science center dr
new hope MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury 12804
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key12547841
MDR Text Key273814897
Report Number3006513822-2021-00048
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ONU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P130024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9014
Device Catalogue Number9111413400040
Device Lot NumberGFFQ1618
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/02/2021
Initial Date FDA Received09/29/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/08/2021
07/28/2022
09/23/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/12/2021
07/28/2022
10/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age88 YR
-
-