LUTONIX, INC LUTONIX 018 DRUG COATED DILATATION CATHETER; DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 9014 |
Device Problems
Obstruction of Flow (2423); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
|
Patient Problem
Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
Event Date 08/31/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.(expiry date: 04/2024).Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device allegedly caused an occlusion of the distal circle and of the treated vessel.The current patient status was unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device allegedly caused an occlusion of the distal circle and of the treated vessel.The current patient status was unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported re-occlusion as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device allegedly caused an occlusion of the distal circle and of the treated vessel.The current patient status was unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the product associated with this file is not cleared for marketing or commercial distribution in the united states and does not have a similar device, therefore, the file was reassessed and no longer reportable; however an initial mdr was submitted to fda, so the reportability of the file will remain as serious injury.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported re-occlusion as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: (expiry date: 04/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: additional information has been received, there is a similar device approved in the us.Therfore, the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be reportable as serious injury.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported reocclusion as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 04/2024), g3.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device allegedly caused an occlusion of the distal circle and of the treated vessel.The current patient status was unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|