• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 6; DXE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 6; DXE Back to Search Results
Model Number CAT6KIT-A
Device Problems Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/07/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned cat6 revealed that the catheter was fractured, and the complaint was confirmed.The probable cause of the reported failure is likely due to forceful retraction against resistance, based on the damage at the fractured location.If the cat6 is forcefully retracted against resistance during use, damage such as a fracture may occur.Further evaluation revealed kinks and ovalization on the fractured distal segment.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint, and the root cause could not be determined; however, this damage may have contributed to resistance during removal of the cat6.The complaint did not involve any functional issues on the aspiration tubing, and therefore, no functional testing was performed.Penumbra products are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) using an indigo system aspiration catheter 6 (cat6) and a non penumbra 6 fr guide sheath.During the procedure, the physician advanced the cat6 through the guide sheath and into the target location through a contralateral approach and aspirated some clot; however, the physician encountered some resistance.On the second pass, the physician encountered more resistance and thought that the cat6 had become stuck in a previously placed stent.While retracting the cat6, the physician encountered more resistance and subsequently noticed that the distal tip of the cat6 was separated but still intact.It was reported that the physician was able to retrieve the distal tip of the cat6 and the cat6 without any medical intervention.No additional information regarding the completion of the procedure was provided.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 6
Type of Device
DXE
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key12558222
MDR Text Key274237091
Report Number3005168196-2021-02165
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00815948020405
UDI-Public00815948020405
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160533
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,09/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/02/2023
Device Model NumberCAT6KIT-A
Device Catalogue NumberCAT6KIT
Device Lot NumberF101684
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/13/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/27/2021
Initial Date FDA Received09/30/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/02/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
-
-