Production process analysis: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to apifix specifications.User (surgeon) information analysis: once the implant will be available for investigation full evaluation will be done to understand the cause.Risk assessment: the company's vigilance activities demonstrate that mid-c system mechanical noise is usually secondary to a malfunction of the device ratchet, breakage or components come to loosen and rarely as a standalone complaint.In the present report, the noise was reported with occasional pain, and the removal surgery was performed for cautionary measures., the company will evaluate the type of wear particles present and ask the surgeon if swab or tissue samples were procured at the site of the discoloration.Upon completion of the investigation, the present complaint will be updated accordingly.The risk of inflammation has been assessed and found to be acceptable ((b)(4)) this complaint does not raise the probability rate.At the time of this report ( (b)(6) 2021), the company's incident rate of noise is (b)(4) the company continues to monitor this type of event routinely.The risk of pain is a known risk that has been assessed and found to be acceptable ( (b)(4) ).Event of pain addressed in the ifu warnings and precautions section: "metallic implants can loosen, fracture, corrode, migrate, or cause pain".
|