This is filed to report difficult to remove, tissue damage it was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.It was noted bilateral posterior prolapse.The first clip was implanted on the medial side.A second clip delivery system (cds) was to be advanced to the mitral valve and placed on the lateral side; however, the clip would not fully close.Reportedly, visualizing the clip during steering was difficult due to a severely enlarged left atrium.Due to tension, the clip could not cross into the valve.The clip was inverted to be removed from the valve, but the clip became stuck.Imaging showed tissue wrapped around the clip arms.The physician under straddled the cds to free the clip.The clip arms were able to close and the cds was removed from the patient.Additional treatment was not performed.One clip was implanted, reducing mr to 2-3.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lots that would have contributed to this event and a review of the complaint history identified no similar incident reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed and without a device to analyze, a cause for the reported clip close difficulty could not be determined.The reported poor imaging was due to challenging patient anatomy.The reported failure to advance and difficult to remove from anatomy appear to be a result of procedural circumstances.Tissue damage was a cascading event of reported difficult to remove from anatomy.Additionally, the patient effect of tissue damage is listed in the mitraclip g4 system instructions for use as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|