• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC SOF-FLEX PEDIATRIC DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC SOF-FLEX PEDIATRIC DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G14840
Device Problem Unraveled Material (1664)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/09/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) #- k180053.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
As reported, during a laparoscopic pyeloplasty of the ureter, the wire of a sof-flex pediatric double pigtail ureteral stent set unraveled.The stent was advanced over the wire guide without inconvenience.Resistance was felt when removing the wire, which unraveled as it was removed through a needle.The guide wire lost its helical shape, and the coating peeled off the wire.Another catheter was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, during a laparoscopic pyleloplasty of the ureter, the wire of a sof-flex pediatric double pigtail ureteral stent set unraveled.The stent was advanced over the wire guide without inconvenience.Resistance was felt when removing the wire, which unraveled as it was removed through a needle.The guide wire lost its helical shape, and the coating peeled off the wire.The stent was damaged by the wire guide.Another catheter was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.An interview with personnel was also conducted.A device failure analysis was not able to be conducted as the device was not returned by the customer.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.The relevant manufacturing documents were reviewed, and cook concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify the failure mode described by the customer prior to distribution.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The product instructions for use (ifu) provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode.¿precautions ¿ manipulation of the wire guide requires appropriate imaging control.Use caution not to force or overmanipulate the wire guide when gaining access.¿ when using a wire guide through a metal cannula/needle, use caution as damage may occur to the outer coating.¿ ¿how supplied ¿ sterile if package is unopened or undamaged.Do not use the product if there is doubt as to whether the product is sterile.Store in a dark, dry, cool place.Avoid extended exposure to light.Upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ a cause of the complaint could not be established.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No new patient or event information to report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SOF-FLEX PEDIATRIC DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key12625388
MDR Text Key276194046
Report Number1820334-2021-02319
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002148406
UDI-Public(01)00827002148406(17)240114(10)13689721
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/14/2024
Device Model NumberG14840
Device Catalogue Number039516
Device Lot Number13689721
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/05/2021
Initial Date FDA Received10/13/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/18/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/07/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/14/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-