• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES BD FACS LYSE WASH ASSISTANT; STATION, PIPETTING DILUTING CLINICAL USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES BD FACS LYSE WASH ASSISTANT; STATION, PIPETTING DILUTING CLINICAL USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 337146
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/20/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device expiration date: na.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there were erroneous results while using bd facs lyse wash assistant.These are related to ivd instrument hardware, ivd/asr reagent, and ruo ldt reagent.It is unclear whether the erroneous results were caused from an ruo reagent, or a combination of ivd or ruo reagents, or the instrument.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: as reported code it is mentioned as "result - erroneous diagnostic".Are there erroneous results on patient samples for diagnostic test? (if yes, go to question #2, if no, no further questions required.) yes.Was there any delay of treatment due to the issue? (go to question #3) no.If patient samples were redrawn, was there any change or delay of treatment? (go to question #4) no.Was there any physical harm/injury to the patient due to the issue? (if yes, go to question #5.If no, no further questions required) no.Provide details - how and to what extent? (go to question #6) the samples were patients samples, but the erroneous tubes have been discarded and prepared again manually.No impact on patients.What is the current medical status? (no further questions required.).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: scope of issue: the scope of issue is only limited to bd facs lyse wash assistant, part # 337146 and serial # (b)(6).Problem statement: customer reported a complaint regarding their instrument producing erroneous results.Manufacturing defect trend: there are zero qns (quality notifications) related to the reported issue.Date range from (b)(6) 2020 to (b)(6) 2021.Complaint trend: there are 6 complaints related to erroneous results; date range from (b)(6) 2020 to (b)(6) 2021.Manufacturing device history record (dhr) review: dhr part #337146, serial # (b)(6), file # (b)(4), was reviewed.The instrument met all the manufacturing specifications prior to release.Investigation result / analysis: the investigation was performed and based on the review of the complaint trend, defect trend, dhr, risk analysis and servicemax, the root cause of the erroneous results was due to a worn dispensing probe assembly.This assembly handles the measurement and controlled dispense of reagents into samples to prepare them for testing.Failures within this function can lead to improperly prepared samples and subsequent failed tests and erroneous results.The customer had initially reported that the instrument was occasionally not dispensing enough lysant.The fse (field service engineer) confirmed the issue and replaced the assembly probe mechanism (pn 34607219).After installing the part, the fse performed a sample carousel alignment, functionality test, and positive acceptance test.No parts were requested for evaluation as the replaced part was not required for the investigation.After the repair and tests, the instrument was reported to be functioning as expected.Although the unexpected results were from patient samples, the customer confirmed that the erroneous results gathered were not used for the treatment of any patients, and the samples were prepared again manually.There was no delay in treatment, and the patient was not harmed in any way.Proper daily and monthly cleaning procedures can prevent blockages within the fluidics system and maintain instrument health, and can be found under ¿maintenance¿ in the user guide; bd facs¿ lyse wash assistant system instructions for use, #23-11113-01 rev.1/vers.A, page 111.The safety risk is severe, s4, though there was no impact to patient health or safety.Service max review: review of related work order #: (b)(4), case # (b)(4).Install date: (b)(6) 2016.Defective part number: 34607219 - assembly probe mechanism repaired work order notes: o subject / reported: 337146 - bd facs lyse wash assistant - incorrect dispensing of lysant o problem description: the instrument does not dispense the lysant or dispenses a small amount and the stroke is aborted.The problem occurs randomly, sometimes in the first tubes but not always.O work performed: general check of the instrument and diagnosis of the problem.Lysant dispensing unit replacement and sample carousel alignment.Functionality test and positive acceptance test.The instrument works properly within bd's technical specifications.O cause: probe mechanism assy.O solution: none.Returned sample evaluation: a return sample was not requested because while the replaced part is returnable, additional information was not required for the investigation.Risk analysis: risk management file part # ra337408, rev.01/vers.A, bd facs lyse/wash assistant (wa) system hazards analysis report was reviewed.No new hazards have been identified and the current mitigation is sufficient.The severity rating in this file is ¿8d¿ based on the previous scale rating.This rating is equivalent to ¿s4¿ in sop6078-02 rev.12/vers.J, whereby the event may cause erroneous results in testing and/or a significant delay in treatment.The current mitigations are adequate with the risk acceptability as moderate.Hazard(s) identified? yes no o hazard: loss of sample.O target & effect: 1-delayed or no diagnosis, 2-increased cost of test due to the need to reprep and rerun.O cause: n/a.O basic event: 1.3.1.3.1.2 pump to probe.O initial risk: 12d.O risk controls: 1.User's guide: flush dispense before long inactivity.O final risk: 8d.Mitigation(s) sufficient yes no.Root cause: based on the investigation results the root cause of the erroneous results was due to a worn dispensing probe assembly.Conclusion: based on the investigation results the root cause of the erroneous results was due to a worn dispensing probe assembly.The fse confirmed the issue and replaced the dispensing unit.After installing the part, the fse performed a sample carousel alignment and functionality and positive acceptance tests to confirm that the instrument was functioning within bd¿s technical specifications.No one was harmed or injured, and no medical diagnosis was performed due to the erroneous results.The safety risk is severe, s4, though there was no impact to patient health or safety.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there were erroneous results while using bd facs lyse wash assistant.These are related to ivd instrument hardware, ivd/asr reagent, and ruo ldt reagent.It is unclear whether the erroneous results were caused from an ruo reagent, or a combination of ivd or ruo reagents, or the instrument.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: as reported code it is mentioned as "result - erroneous diagnostic".1.Are there erroneous results on patient samples for diagnostic test? (if yes, go to question #2, if no, no further questions required.) yes 2.Was there any delay of treatment due to the issue? (go to question #3) no 3.If patient samples were redrawn, was there any change or delay of treatment? (go to question #4) no 4.Was there any physical harm/injury to the patient due to the issue? (if yes, go to question #5.If no, no further questions required) no 5.Provide details - how and to what extent? (go to question #6) the samples were patients samples, but the erroneous tubes have been discarded and prepared again manually.No impact on patients.6.What is the current medical status? (no further questions required.).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD FACS LYSE WASH ASSISTANT
Type of Device
STATION, PIPETTING DILUTING CLINICAL USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES
2350 qume drive
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES
2350 qume drive
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
katie swenson
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key12632743
MDR Text Key276618993
Report Number2916837-2021-00397
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JQW
UDI-Device Identifier00382903371464
UDI-Public00382903371464
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/13/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number337146
Device Catalogue Number337146
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/05/2021
Initial Date FDA Received10/14/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/13/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/16/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/10/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-