A male patient underwent an aquablation procedure for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph).Procept biorobotics corporation became aware that prior to treatment, as the treating physician attempted to place the aquabeam handpiece and aquabeam scope inside an unusual patient anatomy with a high bladder neck and a large intervesicle median lobe, the handpiece and scope bent and broke.The treating physician replaced the handpiece and scope with new units.The second handpiece was not able to advance over the large intervesicle median lobe, and eventually bent inside the patient.The decision was made to abort the aquablation procedure and convert to a transurethral resection of the prostate (turp) surgical procedure to treat the patient.There were no adverse health consequences to the patient due to the reported event.
|
H.10 additional manufacturer narrative: the aquabeam handpiece was not returned for investigation of this complaint.A review of the device history record (dhr) for serial number (b)(6) and the aquabeam handpiece / lot number 21c01367r was performed, which confirmed that there were no nonconformances, failures, discrepancies, or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the system and its associated component met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.A review of similar complaints confirmed no other similar events reported to procept.The aquabeam robotic system's instructions for use (ifu), ifu0101-00, rev.E, was reviewed and states the following: contraindications: do not use the aquabeam robotic system in patients who do not meet the indication for the system's intended use.The reported event is unrelated to any alleged deficiencies related to the identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, effectiveness, or performance of the aquabeam handpiece or aquabeam robotic system.The information received indicated that the aquablation procedure was not a good option for this patient's anatomy; therefore, the procedure was converted to turp.Based on the information received, plus the review of the dhr and labeling this event is unrelated to the performance of the aquabeam robotic system.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|